- Monday - 3:5:56-57 (The Messiah)
- Tuesday - 3:6:1-7 (The Good That Is to Be)
- Wednesday/Thursday - 3:6:8-17 (The Good That Is to Be)
- Friday - 3:6:18-27 (Resurrection of the Dead)
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Sefer Ha-Bloggadah: week 47
This is it! The end of year 1! And what a climax it is! We'll formally complete year 1 with a siyyum next week at the NHC Summer Institute. Post a comment if you'll be there and are interested in participating in the siyyum and haven't let us know yet.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Sefer Ha-Bloggadah: week 46
From out of the the harsh experience of exile, we turn our thoughts to redemption. This is the penultimate week of the first year of the project!
- Monday - 3:5:1-2 (Archives of Travails and Archives of Deliverance)
- Tuesday - 3:5:3-8 (The Merit of the Fathers)
- Wednesday - 3:5:9-22 (The Time of Redemption)
- Thursday - 3:5:23-35 (The Footprints of the Messiah)
- Friday - 3:5:36-49 (Redemption and the Ingathering of Exiles)
- Saturday/Sunday - 3:5:50-55 (The Day of Darkness and Light)
Monday, July 13, 2009
Sefer Ha-Bloggadah: week 45
The Three Weeks continue, and so does the narrative of exile.
- Monday - 3:4:25-35 (The Hardship of Exile and the Enslavement by Kingdoms)
- Tuesday - 3:4:26-39 (Israel: An Object of Derision among the Nations)
- Wednesday - 3:4:40-48 (The Holy One is Partner in Israel's Travail)
- Thursday - 3:4:49-58 (The Guardian of Israel)
- Friday - 3:4:59-69 (Watchman, What of the Night?)
- Saturday/Sunday - 3:4:70-79 (Watchman, What of the Night?)
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Sefer Ha-Bloggadah: week 44
The beginning of the section on exile coincides with the beginning of the Three Weeks of mourning leading up to 9 Av.
- Monday - 3:2:92-109 (A Land Flowing with Milk and Honey)
- Tuesday - 3:2:110-126 (Jerusalem)
- Wednesday - 3:3:1-9 (The Sacred Tongue)
- Thursday - 3:3:10-23 (The Sacred Tongue and Other Languages; Exactness in the Use of Language)
- Friday - 3:4:1-14 (The Hardship of Exile and the Enslavement by Kingdoms)
- Saturday/Sunday - 3:4:15-24 (The Hardship of Exile and the Enslavement by Kingdoms)
Thursday, July 2, 2009
3:2:49 Distorting the Law in Order to Save It?
This text says that, when Hanina the nephew of R' Yehoshua went to Babylonia (apparently after the crushing of the Bar Kochba rebellion), he made decisions regarding declaring Rosh Hodesh and intercalating the year, and that the authorities in the Land of Israel sent two scholars after him. They told Hanina, disingenuously, that they were coming to learn Torah from him. He then extolled them to the Jewish community in Babylonia, calling them great scholars. Then they began contradicting him -- he would declare an object impure and they would declare it pure; he would forbid an action and they would permit it. Frustrated, and embarrassed, he proclaimed that they were good-for-nothings, but they pointed out that he had already vouched for them and could not undo that. He then asked why they kept contradicting his rulings.
Their response is that it is because he had been making calendrical decisions outside the Land of Israel. This response is fascinating -- they do not indicate in any way that his decisions about ritual purity, or on prohibited actions, were wrong. They apparently set about systematically overruling all of his decisions on all sorts of halachic questions, even though, it seems, he was right in those decisions. Preserving the central authority to set the calendar was considered so important that it not only warranted sending two scholars on a trip to Babylonia, and not only warranted threatening Hanina and the entire Babylonian Jewish community with excommunication if they didn't fall in line. It also warranted actually making wrong legal decisions, telling people that they could use objects that were really impure, and telling people that they could perform actions that were really forbidden, just in order to undermine Hanina's authority.
Their response is that it is because he had been making calendrical decisions outside the Land of Israel. This response is fascinating -- they do not indicate in any way that his decisions about ritual purity, or on prohibited actions, were wrong. They apparently set about systematically overruling all of his decisions on all sorts of halachic questions, even though, it seems, he was right in those decisions. Preserving the central authority to set the calendar was considered so important that it not only warranted sending two scholars on a trip to Babylonia, and not only warranted threatening Hanina and the entire Babylonian Jewish community with excommunication if they didn't fall in line. It also warranted actually making wrong legal decisions, telling people that they could use objects that were really impure, and telling people that they could perform actions that were really forbidden, just in order to undermine Hanina's authority.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)